Shortly after congress was disrupted by violence, while certifying presidential elector reports, Congressman Markwayne Mullin spoke to KFAQ radio host, Pat Campbell. We carried that interview.
​Almost immediately, Mullin decided not to do anymore interviews on the topic. Until this month.
Mullin’s former colleague, Trey Gowdy, asked Mullin to talk about what happened, and Mullin decided to tell Gowdy’s Fox Nation audience even more than we’ve ever previously heard. 
The January 6th details Mullin shared include.

  • Actually watching Ashley Babbitt being shot. 
  • Planning to confiscate a sidearm from a capitol police officer.
  • Creating a ‘choke point’ to impede the storming of the House chamber.
  • Contesting the capitol police strategy, and prevailing, leading to members evacuating via the back stairs.
  • Debriefing and consoling 50 injured capitol security personnel.
Picture

Mullin says he quickly took a leadership role when he saw how poorly trained the capitol police were. the officer at the top center of the photo, is the man who admitted killing Ashley Babbett.

 Mullin also revealed that he

  • took part in multiple foreign operations “outside the Department of Defense”, as recent as 2011. 
  • Was asked to do a ‘contract’ in 2016.
  • Still struggles internally about whether he would have actually used lethal force to put down the rioters who used violence on police and others.
Some statements from Mullin are needing clarity. He seems to say that the whole Trump rally on the DC Mall shouldn’t have happened.  That event drew over 100,000 peaceful citizens, exercising their 1st amendment right to peaceful assembly, near the Washington Monument (a mile away from the Capitol Building.
 And the citizens who stood outside the capitol building, singing the national Anthem and praying for the nation. They all have a constitutional right to petition government for redress of grievance. It is not the right nor authority of a government to tell us how and when our petitioning is to occur. 
  What is clear, is that a few chaos actors and perhaps even subversive infiltrators, quickly got the voice of the people silenced, by moving to violent behavior, thus negating the nature of the assembly from peaceful.. to riotous.
Congressman Mullin makes a very good point about how the narrative was changed as a result of the capitol riot. It took the focus off of the election, itself, and all the troubling lack of transparency; as well as the inconsistent implementation of statutory law, in balloting and counting.
​Mullin is to be commended for adding more details, but perhaps a better-worded press release, would avoid some of the ambiguity and worse; statements that seem to conflict with constitutional rights of the people, and the president.
 Perhaps one day, Mullin will tell us more about his mysterious career as a covert operative contractor for the US govt.
The interview was otherwise a great profile of a man who has accomplished great things for his family and business, against very difficult odds.
One last point.  Mullin seems to have operated under the mindset of ‘us against the rioters’. Most people in his position probably would, at that moment. 
But most of the very divided country saw the congress itself, divided between the good guys and the bad actors. 
What we still don’t have sufficient answers about is; what was the FBI involvement, and what entities supplied and organized the violent entry into the capitol. Leftists are trying to say that the 100,000 rally-goers, and the president, were the ones conspiring to overthrow the govt. But the reality is, most of the rally-goers remained outside the capitol and sang patriotic anthems.