Who would have believed back in 2019 that churches within the United States would shut their doors the following year and not meet for months due to a supposed mandate from the state governments? Certainly this could never happen in America, the bastion of freedom of religion. No church gatherings because they were deemed non-essential but abortions, alcohol, and firearms and ammunition stores were considered essential. Firearms and ammunition are reasonable since they are protected by the US Constitution 2nd Amendment. But what about the 1st Amendment. Why was this amendment considered non-essential?
Sit back for a moment and think about what has occurred during the last 5 months. Think about the number of outlandish actions that have been taken by governments all over the world and the reactions by the citizens of those countries. Are there any subjects that just pop out at you?
I’ll start with the most obvious: shutting down the economy… of the ENTIRE world. Who, in their right mind, would ever do such a thing? How can it be orchestrated that, in lockstep, all but a handful of countries completely went into hiding, forbidding almost all businesses to operate. Even during the “Spanish” flu in 1918 the world continued to function and the “Spanish” flu was hundreds of times more deadly. {The epicenter of the “Spanish” flu was Fort Riley, Kansas where some interesting stuff was going on before soldiers shipped out overseas – look it up.}
Several questions come to mind.
Did any leaders of those countries that shut down think about the ramifications of ceasing economic activity on:
- their country’s tax revenue capability?
- their citizens, such as despair, alcohol abuse, family abuse, suicide?
- their country’s food supply?
- reopening, then re-closing restaurants, then reopening them and other small businesses.
- citizens who lost their jobs and who worked for businesses that will probably never reopen. Although paying extended unemployment (some making even more out of work than they made while working), what will happen when October comes and there are no jobs to be had?
What is the reason for 6 feet between people?
- Is there any scientific reason for 6 feet? Why not 5.5 feet or 2 meters or some other length?
- Is this a form of psychological abuse by not allowing people to interact? This is especially effective on children.
- How humane is this when one is unable to be with a loved one in the hospital or a nursing home when that loved one is dieing? What kind of person makes people die alone?
What about masks?
- Anthony Fauci says people should not wear masks…they are not effective, people won’t wear them properly, and first line caretakers need them.
- Anthony Fauci says he lied earlier (1 above) and people SHOULD wear masks, even if they don’t wear them properly.
- Medical personnel and some investigators have stated that masks cause oxygen deprivation and cause the wearer to magnify any pathogens they are breathing out.
- Wearing a mask causes people to appear less human, making social interaction much more difficult (can’t see facial expressions, difficulty in understanding what they are saying – reading lips, etc)
How about public schools?Think of your school experience…now think of children that will:
- sit six feet from other children.
- have a plastic shield around the desk.
- not be able to pass notes to each other (part of being a kid with friends – maybe not exactly “proper’ classroom etiquette)
- go to a playground and be given a 6 foot box to stand in -no tag, no climbing on jungle gyms, no swinging, NO FUN.
- more psychological abuse and behavioral conditioning.
INDUSTRIES DECIMATED
- Airlines. First it was the TSA that caused flying to be arduous (9/11). Now it is wearing a mask while flying and being thrown off the plane if you refuse to do so along with still being abused by the TSA.
- Agriculture. Most food producers and food transport companies have scaled back severely due to restaurants being closed or open at one-quarter capacity.
- Tourism/Hotels/Cruise lines. Many countries are not accepting tourists from other countries. Tourist places within the US are requiring masks, social isolation, or are not open at all (such as national parks, etc). Hotels in the US that had been offering free breakfast, workout rooms, and pools have cancelled the breakfasts and closed the pools and workout rooms. Some states (as was shown in the previous blog concerning New Mexico) require visitors to quarantine (isolation) for two weeks and threaten fines for those not wearing masks.
- All small shops designated non-essential. Guess who pays the bulk of taxes and fees to the government.
Why would people known to be ill be transferred from hospitals to nursing homes unless to prematurely end the lives of as many residents as possible.
Why would perfectly healthy people be told to cower in their houses for months at a time rather than asking only those who were in danger to do so, and do so without being forced.
How many homeless, who had no houses to cower in nor places to continuously wash their hands contracted or died from this pandemic?
Why would doctors continue to use ventilators even though the mortality rate of those put on ventilators was almost 100%. Why were hospitals paid an incentive to put people on ventilators?
Why would the CDC tell doctors to put COVID-19 on all death certificates even if the person died of a co-morbidity if the doctor thought they could have also contracted COVID-19.
Why were incentives given to hospitals who had people die of COVID-19 (see above). Could it be to increase the number of cases and deaths?
Why would effective treatments such as Hydroxychloroquine along with zinc and erythromycin be shunned even though this inexpensive treatment was showing great promise and had been used in the previous SARS outbreak in the early 2000s?
Why would a test that was developed in the 80’s by someone who said it should not be used to diagnose illness be the test the CDC decided to use to test for a virus that has not even been isolated? The “test” is known to provide false positives (again, it is not being used properly as stated by its creator).
What are they doing with the DNA being retrieved by the above test? It obviously wasn’t to see if you were infected.
Why has the narrative changed from the number of people hospitalized and dead to those who are infected? Don’t we want more people to be infected to reach the vaunted herd immunity? Doesn’t it make sense that the more people tested with a faulty test that gives false positives, the number of positive cases would increase?
Must the entire world population receive a rushed vaccine that has not gone through proper trials and that is based on other similar previous attempts that caused all of the animal subjects to die a horrible death when exposed to the pathogen they had been inoculated against?
Will the current vaccine trials on humans forgo the final step in a proper test to expose them to the virus once they have received the inoculation? If so, will the researchers be satisfied if all of the test subjects die or have adverse reactions? If the trials fail, will this mean perpetual house arrest?
Should those not willing to be experimented on by not receiving the above vaccine be forced to do so? Who is actually in danger, the one that is vaccinated or the one not vaccinated? How does a non-vaccinated person threaten one who is vaccinated? If the one vaccinated is threatened, how effective, then, is the vaccine?
The same argument can be made concerning masks. If I do not wear a mask, how do I threaten you if you decide to wear a mask? If I am a threat to you, you must admit that your mask does not work. If your mask does not work, why would my mask magically work?
I hope you can see from the above questions and statements that this entire episode is a con game and the world is playing right along with it.
Why is all of this happening? Well, our friendly Eugenicist, Mr. Bill Gates has stated that the world population needs to get down from 7 billion down to 500 million. He believes that number is one that the world can properly sustain. I believe this is just round one in a game for all the marbles. I would suspect he does not believe he should be among the number of people culled from the herd.
GOOD NEWS
The good news is that the agenda cannot continue if we refuse to play. Don’t wear a mask, don’t social isolate. Don’t go along with any of the baloney. Don’t let these restrictions become the ‘new’ normal. Notice how the Black Lives Matter get a pass on these restrictions. Others are shamed on twitter and other social media if they go en-mass to the beach to enjoy the sun (vitamin D) and the cooler air and salt water.
“Fight and you may die. Run, and you’ll live… at least a while. And dying in your beds, many years from now, would you be willin’ to trade all the days, from this day to that, for one chance, just one chance, to come back here and tell our enemies that they may take our lives, but they’ll never take… our freedom!” – Mel Gibson as William Wallace in the movie “Braveheart”
You must be logged in to post a comment.